Human Health
| Year | Study | Abstract / Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Problems in evaluating the health impacts of radio frequency radiation by Ishai et al. | ”We conclude that there is substantial scientific evidence that RFR causes cancer, endocrinological, neurological and other adverse health effects. In light of this evidence the primary mission of public bodies, such as the FCC to protect public health has not been fulfilled. Rather, we find that industry convenience is being prioritized and thereby subjecting the public to avoidable risks.” |
| 2021 | Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress-Biological Effects and Consequences for Health by Schuermann and Mevissen | |
| 2019 | Commentary on the utility of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation data for assessing human health risks despite unfounded criticisms aimed at minimizing the findings of adverse health effects by Ronald Melnick | ”These results, as well as the findings of significantly increased DNA damage (strand breaks) in the brains of exposed rats and mice, reduced pup birth weights when pregnant dams were exposed to GSM- or CDMA-modulated RFR, and the induction of cardiomyopathy of the right ventricle in male and female rats clearly demonstrate that [RF safety] has been disproved.” |
| 2019 | Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz by Hardell and Carlberg | ”We conclude that there is clear evidence that RF radiation is a human carcinogen, causing glioma and vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma). There is some evidence of an increased risk of developing thyroid cancer, and clear evidence that RF radiation is a multi‑site carcinogen.” |
| 2018 | Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields by Miller et al. | ”When considered with recent animal experimental evidence, the recent epidemiological studies strengthen and support the conclusion that RFR should be categorized as carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 1).“ |
| 2014 | The Influence of Direct Mobile Phone Radiation on Sperm Quality by Gorpinchenko et al. | |
| 2011 | The INTERPHONE Study by the INTERPHONE Study Group | |
| 2009 | Electric Polarization and the Viability of Living Systems: Ion Cyclotron Resonance-like Interactions by A. R. Liboff | |
| 2004 | Magnetic-Field-Induced DNA Strand Breaks in Brain Cells of the Rat by Lai and Singh |
Environmental Health
Philmont’s Microwave Radiation Footprint by Kate Hurd
Radiofrequency Radiation Injures Trees Around Mobile Phone Base Stations by Waldmann-Selsam et. al.